NiMBaLWear analytics pipeline for wearable sensors: a modular, open-source platform for evaluating multiple domains of health and behaviour
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Recent technological advances have led to a surge in the use of wearable devices for personal health and fitness monitoring; however, clinical uptake of wearable devices for remote or 'free-living' measurement of daily health-related behavior has lagged. To advance the field, there is need for valid and reliable outcomes across multiple health domains specific to the cohorts or patients of interest and centralized tools to build capacity for use of these data. The NiMBaLWear pipeline provides a flexible and integrated approach to wearables analytics applied to raw sensor data that considers multiple, inter-related physiological and behavioral signals to provide a holistic view of health status. Results & discussion: NiMBaLWear is a modular, open-source, wearable sensor analytic pipeline that quantifies physical activity, mobility, and sleep from raw single- or multi-sensor free-living data collected over multiple days. Data captured from any device, in different possible formats, are standardized prior to processing. Data preparation includes accelerometer autocalibration, cross-device synchronization, and non-wear detection. Validated, domain-specific algorithms detect events, generate outcome measures, and output standardized tabular data and user-friendly summary collection reports. NiMBaLWear was developed in Python using an iterative and incremental software development process, which included a combination of semi-automated inspection and expert review of data collected from 286 participants across two remote-measurement studies. A comparative analysis revealed a paucity of open-source packages capable of deriving and sharing health-related behavioral outcomes across multiple domains from multi-sensor wearables data. Forthcoming improvements to the pipeline will leverage sensor fusion techniques to add new, and refine existing, domain- and disease-specific analytics, and optimize pipeline accessibility and reporting. Conclusion: The NiMBaLWear pipeline transforms raw multi-sensor wearables data into accurate and relevant outcomes across multiple health domains to objectively characterize and measure an individual's daily health-related behavior. NiMBaLWear's focus on high-quality, clinically relevant outcomes, as well as end-user optimization, provides a foundation for innovation to improve the utility of wearables for clinical care and self-management of health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".