MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392738702 · doi:10.59876/a-3rzh-qdan

NOTE DE RECHERCHE: LE RÉSEAU D'ENTREPRISES: VERS UNE SYNTHÈSE DES CONNAISSANCES

2003· article· en· W4392738702 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement international · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategy and Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrder (exchange)PanoramaCorporate governanceSociologyRegional scienceWelfare economicsComputer scienceBusinessManagementArtificial intelligenceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article looks at the state of theoretical knowledge in the area of corporate networks. The first part is focused on studying the positioning of the network in the layout of inter firm transactions, in comparison with other more traditional forms of organization such as the market and integration. The second part lays out a panorama of corporate networks in the United States, Europe, and Japan, using a classification based on geographic location, cultural specificities of the actors, management style, and governance mechanisms. In order to complete this photographic view, the article then underlines the main stages in the life cycle of a network, which leads to reflection on the modes of evolution and transformation of this method of organization. Finally, some avenues of research are mentioned in order to put transversal and typological approaches in perspective with longitudinal approaches that are devoted to the life cycle of networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it