MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392738715 · doi:10.59876/a-1xyp-5rw2

Pour une version non seulement lucrative de l'entrepreneur: exemples tirés de la zone Océan Indien

2001· article· en· W4392738715 on OpenAlex
Patrick Valéau

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement international · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal and Cross-Cultural Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisionProfit (economics)EntrepreneurshipEconomyBusinessSociologyEconomicsFinanceAnthropologyNeoclassical economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Entrepreneurship evokes innovation, risk-taking, detecting business opportunities, and profit. These ideas reflect the cultural contexts in which the authors have elaborated them, whether that be (mainly) North America or Europe. No doubt they do not consider all the enterprises present in these countries. Whatever the case, the ideas are harder to apply in other regions of the world. By taking examples from the Indian Ocean Zone, this article shows that all entrepreneurial behaviors may not fit in these reference frames. Certain managers develop complex visions and ambitions integrating a multiplicity of goals that are not simply lucrative. According to the author, they undeniably take on the status of entrepreneur. In certain respects, their cross-breed vision of "business" makes them more like non-profit organizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it