MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392738721 · doi:10.59876/a-4kfh-1yz4

NOTE DE RECHERCHE: TRADITIONS NATIONALES ET GESTION D'ENTREPRISE: PORTÉE ET LIMITES DE L'APPROCHE D'IRIBARNIENNE DANS L'ANALYSE DE LA CULTURE MAROCAINE

2002· article· en· W4392738721 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Brahim ALLALI

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement international · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal and Cross-Cultural Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContextualizationSociologyPort (circuit theory)HumanitiesManagementPhilosophyEngineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents and discusses the extrapolative analytical approach used by Philippe d'Iribarne and his team to study corporate management and national traditions. d'Iribarne's study of SGS-Thomson in Casablanca and contextualization in Moroccan culture of representations made by individuals and groups of their experience working in the enterprise. Other explanations for the behaviors analyzed are proposed, and it is concluded that, although still valid overall, d'Iribarne's framework would benefit from being adjusted to avoid hasty extrapolations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.072
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.108
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0720.108
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.022
Scholarly communication0.0140.017
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement internationalSame topicGlobal and Cross-Cultural ManagementFrench-language works237,207