MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quantum Transport Simulations in 2D Materials for Enhanced High-Frequency Circuit Performance

2023· article· en· W4392739530 on OpenAlexaff
A. Yadagiri, B. Pravallika, Manjunatha Manjunatha, Amit Dutt, Rupa Rani Sharma, Asraa Ahmed Khafel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topic2D Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOptoelectronicsQuantumElectronic engineeringMaterials sciencePhysicsEngineeringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to their distinct electrical characteristics, two-dimensional (2D) materials have become more attractive as potential candidates for next-generation electronic devices in recent years. This work explores 2D material quantum transport simulations with the goal of revealing their potential to improve high-frequency circuit performance. We extensively study the electron transport features of several 2D materials such as graphene, black phosphorus, and transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) by using sophisticated quantum transport models. Based on our calculations, we find that 2D materials may lead to improved device performance at high frequencies by having better electron mobility and less scattering effects under certain circumstances. Moreover, these materials' intrinsic quantum confinement characteristics provide unique quantum interference patterns that may be used to create creative circuit designs. The results of this work not only highlight the potential of 2D materials to transform high-frequency electronics, but they also provide a thorough foundation for incorporating them into electronic systems of the future. New technologies that take use of the quantum phenomena of 2D materials may be developed as a result of this study, which will help meet the growing need for quicker and more efficient electronic devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic2D Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207