Development of a Series Hybrid Multirotor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hybrid-electric power is an appealing technology for multirotor platforms due to its ability to enhance the range of the vehicle while providing low emissions and the precise thrust control required for vehicle stability. The development of a multirotor utilizing hybrid propulsion is an essential step for CfAR as it will be the basis of research on this technology in flight. The designed multirotor, MIMIQ (Modular Inertia Matching Quadcopter), is a 32kg quadcopter with a motor-to-motor diameter of 2.7m which will require a total of 3,700W of power to hover. This demand is primarily met by the series hybrid generator onboard which requires the battery to only supplement a portion of that power. At peak thrust however, the motors will demand 12,000W from the system. During these rapid bursts of energy the battery plays a critical roll in providing an immediate response to the power demand which the generator would not be able to provide otherwise. This multirotor is designed to accommodate a wide range of propulsion configurations to optimize performance. In addition, the mechanical characteristics are also intended to be easily adjustable. Parameters such as center of mass, inertia, and motor distance can be adjusted to mimic characteristics of future flight vehicles that implement hybrid systems. Before integration, ground tests were performed on various off-the-shelf hybrid generators in order to evaluate their performance and reliability to ensure that they are well suited for the MIMIQ. To characterize the different modes of operation an extensive performance map was pursued. A number of parameters were measured over time with the most important being load, power, and fuel consumption. It has been proven that at low loads the generator can provide power to the propulsion system while charging the onboard batteries. However, at higher loads both the generator and the battery pack are required to provide power. The tests demonstrated that the integration of a hybrid system into MIMIQ is possible. It was also verified that when the engine is integrated into MIMIQ, both the generator and batteries have to provide power simultaneously in all flight phases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".