MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392741382 · doi:10.53555/sfs.v10i6.2294

Assessment Of Children With Nephrotic Syndrome At Pediatric Hospitals

2023· article· en· W4392741382 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kholoud Rabia Khamis Alsaiary, Ahood Khaled Ayed Almutairi, Siedah Ahmed Ali Al-Hasnah, Abdullah Abdulrahman Abdullah Alquwiz, Naif H. Alotaibi, Mirdas Mohammed Mirdas Alotaibi, Saad Saleh Muqbil Alharbi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNephrotic syndromeMedicinePediatricsIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nephrotic syndrome is a common kidney disorder in children, characterized by the presence of protein in the urine, low blood protein levels, high cholesterol levels, and swelling. Pediatric hospitals play a crucial role in the assessment and management of children with nephrotic syndrome. This essay aims to explore the assessment of children with nephrotic syndrome at pediatric hospitals, focusing on various aspects such as diagnostic procedures, treatment options, and long-term care. The method used in this study involves a review of literature from reputable sources, including journals, articles, and guidelines. The results highlight the importance of early diagnosis, multidisciplinary care, and tailored treatment plans for children with nephrotic syndrome. The discussion emphasizes the need for a holistic approach to managing nephrotic syndrome in children, considering both medical and psychosocial factors. In conclusion, the assessment of children with nephrotic syndrome at pediatric hospitals requires a comprehensive and individualized approach to ensure optimal outcomes and quality of life for these young patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicRenal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesFrench-language works237,207