Study on the Effectiveness of Infusing Ideological Education into Extracurricular Activities in Foreign Language Teaching
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article aims to examine the effectiveness of infusing ideological education into extracurricular activities in foreign language teaching. The activity "International Communication Short Video Competition: Telling Stories about Chinese People" was taken as an illustrative example to interpret students' language performance from the perspective of discourse analysis. High words frequency processed by AntConc3.4.2 reflected the ideological elements in the video scripts, including patriotism, dedication, hard work, unity and friendship. A questionnaire was also administered to 539 students to find out their attitude to these activities. The results showed that students benefited a lot from participating in a wealth of extracurricular activities in the aspects of knowledge acquisition, philosophy of life, and professional skills. Since various extracurricular activities play an important role in shaping core values and morality standard, the article provides teachers with insight about how to integrate ideological education into practical tasks in curriculum-based ideological education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it