Les pays du sud à l'épreuve des normes ISO : vers un sous-développement durable?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The exponential growth of the amount of ISO management systems and the upcoming launch of a new standard on corporate social responsiveness represent opportunities for organizations to promote their social legitimacy and to implement the main concepts of sustainable development through internationally recognized systems. Thus, ISO management systems now cover the main facets of this concept, which proposes to find, at an international level, a balance between economic, environmental, and social issues. Nevertheless, the generalization of these standards and their possible use for promoting sustainability call for major questioning, especially for southern countries. Indeed, by their cultural and economic specificities, organizations from these countries remain a priori relatively impervious to the formalist proposals of ISO management systems. This imperviousness is reflected in the international distribution of the amount of certified organizations, which shows a clear gap between northern and southern countries. This paper proposes to analyze the stakes of the generalization of these standards by showing their pertinence and their limits to promote the concept of sustainable development, especially in southern countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".