MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392745600 · doi:10.3133/cir1514

StreamStats—A quarter century of delivering web-based geospatial and hydrologic information to the public, and lessons learned

2024· article· en· W4392745600 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kernell G. Ries, Peter A. Steeves, Peter M. McCarthy

Bibliographic record

VenueU.S. Geological Survey circular/U.S. Geological Survey Circular · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeospatial analysisQuarter (Canadian coin)World Wide WebGeographyGeomaticsData scienceComputer scienceCartographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

contributed enthusiasm and funding, as well as all of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) water science center personnel who have worked to provide data and coordinated with the Stream-Stats national development team over the years to implement StreamStats for individual States.Thanks to what was then the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management (MDEM), now part of the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.013
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1850.128

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueU.S. Geological Survey circular/U.S. Geological Survey CircularSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207