Hybrid Neural State-Space Modeling for Supervised and Unsupervised Electrocardiographic Imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
State-space modeling (SSM) provides a general framework for many image reconstruction tasks. Error in a priori physiological knowledge of the imaging physics, can bring incorrectness to solutions. Modern deep-learning approaches show great promise but lack interpretability and rely on large amounts of labeled data. In this paper, we present a novel hybrid SSM framework for electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) to leverage the advantage of state-space formulations in data-driven learning. We first leverage the physics-based forward operator to supervise the learning. We then introduce neural modeling of the transition function and the associated Bayesian filtering strategy. We applied the hybrid SSM framework to reconstruct electrical activity on the heart surface from body-surface potentials. In unsupervised settings of both in-silico and in-vivo data without cardiac electrical activity as the ground truth to supervise the learning, we demonstrated improved ECGI performances of the hybrid SSM framework trained from a small number of ECG observations in comparison to the fixed SSM. We further demonstrated that, when in-silico simulation data becomes available, mixed supervised and unsupervised training of the hybrid SSM achieved a further 40.6% and 45.6% improvements, respectively, in comparison to traditional ECGI baselines and supervised data-driven ECGI baselines for localizing the origin of ventricular activations in real data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".