OmeSim: a genetics-based nonlinear simulator for in-between-ome and phenotype
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Motivation Deciphering genetic basis of complex traits via genotype-phenotype association studies is a long-standing theme in genetics. The availability of molecular omics data (such as transcriptome) has enabled researchers to utilize “in-between-omes” in association studies, for instance transcriptome-wide association study. Although many statistical tests and machine learning models integrating omics in genetic mapping are emerging, there is no standard way to simulate phenotype by genotype with the role of in-between-omes incorporated. Moreover, the involvement of in-between-omes usually bring substantial nonlinear architecture (e.g., co-expression network), that may be non-trivial to simulate. As such, rigorous power estimations, a critical step to test novel models, may not be conducted fairly. Results To address the gap between emerging methods development and the unavailability of adequate simulators, we developed OmeSim, a phenotype simulator incorporating genetics, an in-between-ome (e.g., transcriptome), and their complex relationships including nonlinear architectures. OmeSim outputs detailed causality graphs together with original data, correlations, and associations structures between phenotypic traits and omes terms as comprehensive gold-standard datasets for the verifications of novel tools integrating an in-between-ome in genotype-phenotype association studies. We expect OmeSim to enable rigorous benchmarking for the future multi-omics integrations. Availability https://github.com/zhoulongcoding/OmeSim Contact qingrun.zhang@ucalgary.ca
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".