Bayesian Optimization of Neurostimulation (BOONStim)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment response is influenced by individual variability in brain structure and function. Sophisticated, user-friendly approaches, incorporating both established functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and TMS simulation tools, to identify TMS targets are needed. OBJECTIVE: The current study presents the development and validation of the Bayesian Optimization of Neuro-Stimulation (BOONStim) pipeline. METHODS: BOONStim uses Bayesian optimization for individualized TMS targeting, automating interoperability between surface-based fMRI analytic tools and TMS electric field modeling. Bayesian optimization performance was evaluated in a sample dataset (N=10) using standard circular and functional connectivity-defined targets, and compared to grid optimization. RESULTS: Bayesian optimization converged to similar levels of total electric field stimulation across targets in under 30 iterations, converging within a 5% error of the maxima detected by grid optimization, and requiring less time. CONCLUSIONS: BOONStim is a scalable and configurable user-friendly pipeline for individualized TMS targeting with quick turnaround.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".