MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392748353 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4046318/v1

Association Between Depression and Subjective Well-being in older patients with Chronic Diseases in Rural Ethnic Areas of Qiannan, Guizhou: The Mediating Role of Social Support

2024· preprint· en· W4392748353 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhonglian Li, Suxian Qin, Yafen Zhu, Quanxiang Zhou, Aijing Yi, Caiyun Mo, Jun Gao, Juhai Chen, Tianhui Wang, Zhanhui Feng, Xiangang Mo

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth and Well-being Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDepression (economics)Association (psychology)Ethnic groupSocial supportRural areaPsychologyMedicineDemographyPolitical scienceSociologySocial psychologyPathologyPsychotherapistEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective: To explore the associations among social support, depression, and subjective well-being in older patients with chronic diseases in the rural ethnic regions of Qiannan, Guizhou. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled oder patients with chronic diseases in Qiannan, Guizhou between June and September 2022. The social support, depression, and subjective well-being were assessed by a self-developed questionnaire on general information, the social support rating scale (SSRS), the geriatric depression scale (GDS-15), and the Memorial University of Newfoundland Happiness Scale (MUNSH), respectively. Results: A total of 2,156 participants (1,104 males; average age of 71.15±8.04) were included. Their mean SSRS and MUNSH scores were 34.96±7.98 and 27.17±9.48, respectively. The GDS-15 score was 7.23±2.59, with 1529 individuals (70.9%) having depressive symptoms. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that mild depression (B = -7.795, 95% CI: -8.437 to -7.153, P < 0.001), moderate to severe depression (B = -11.631, 95% CI: -12.623 to -10.639, P < 0.001), and moderate social support (B = -2.661, 95% CI: -4.063 to -1.259, P < 0.001) were independently associated with subjective well-being. The structural equation model results revealed that the total effect of depression symptoms on subjective well-being in elderly patients with chronic diseases is -0.528, with a direct effect of -0.474 (95% CI: -0.503 to -0.443), accounting for 89.77% of the total effect. The mediating effect of social support on the association between depression and subjective well-being is -0.133 (95% CI: -0.070 to -0.041), constituting 10.23% of the total effect. Conclusions: Older patients with chronic diseases in the rural ethnic areas of Qiannan, Guizhou, exhibited a high prevalence of depressive symptoms and low levels of subjective well-being. Social support partially mediated the association between depression and subjective well-being in this population. Thus, proactive measures are warranted to fortify the social support system for older patients with chronic diseases in Qiannan, Guizhou.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicHealth and Well-being StudiesFrench-language works237,207