MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392753866 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-14036

Mitigating Methane Emissions: A Comprehensive Measurement Study of Canadian Landfills

2024· preprint· en· W4392753866 on OpenAlexaffabout
Afshan Khaleghi, Évelise Bourlon, Athar Omidi, Jordan Stuart, Rebecca Martino, Donya Ghasemi, Chelsea Fougère, Andrea Darlington, Sébastien Ars, Lawson Gillespie, Mathias Goeckede, David Risk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandfill Environmental Impact Studies
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaSt. Francis Xavier UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethaneMethane emissionsEnvironmental scienceGreenhouse gasWaste managementBusinessEngineeringChemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada’s waste sector contributes 23% toward national methane emission totals. Recently Canada committed to a 50% reduction in waste sector methane emissions by 2030 from 2020 levels, as part of its Global Methane Pledge action plan. Achieving this ambitious goal will certainty requires that regulators to be armed with an accurate and measurement-informed understanding of landfill methane emissions. In 2022 we carried out a snapshot methane emissions quantification campaign targeting 125 landfills across Canada, followed in 2023 by more detailed source-level measurements across seasons at selected landfills in various climate zones. Snapshot measurements were carried out by vehicle-based surveying coupled with Gaussian and Lagrangian flux inversion, and aircraft mass balance measurements. Repeating source-based measurements were conducted in 2023 across seasons at 12 landfills for 3 climatic regions using vehicle-based surveys, stationary tripod deployments, and drone measurements of plumes, from on-site and off-site locations. Source-specific flux rates were generated based on triangulation, Lagrangian backtrajectory analysis, and a Gaussian dispersion model, and were assessed for magnitude and temporal variability. In snapshot measurement campaigns across the country, we saw generally good agreement between aircraft mass balance and truck measurements, with a moderate but consistent low bias in the truck emission rate estimates. Lagrangian methods to derive flux rate were comparable as long as input data was limited to exclude highly enriched onsite samples. Throughout a varied population of landfills across Canada, we found that emission rate estimates from measurement campaigns were generally in-line with operator-submitted values to the Canadian Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, whereas a First Order Decay model used by the federal government for planning purposes tended to over-estimate landfill emissions. Climate zone was a clear predictor of methane generated per waste in place. In more detailed source studies, we found that numerous features on landfill operations could emit methane, most expected, but some unexpected. Management practice was a strong predictor of whether source types emitted significantly, or not. Meteorology and seasonal changes in climate were also strong predictor of emissions over time. These large-scale studies provide a wealth of data upon which Canada can base regulatory development and will be beneficial to countries with similar waste sector patterns and climates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesFrench-language works237,207