MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392753982 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-13360

Understanding and Addressing Multifaceted Factors Influencing Refugee Food Security: A Comparative Study in Ukraine and Switzerland amid Global Forced Displacement

2024· preprint· en· W4392753982 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Olha Nimko, Rachael Garrett, Katrina M. Powell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeeForced migrationDisplacement (psychology)Food securityPolitical scienceInternally displaced personDevelopment economicsGeographyPsychologyEconomicsLawAgriculture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The humanitarian crisis resulting from forced displacement has escalated the global refugee population to over 108 million individuals in 2022, with 35.3 million classified as refugees. Unfortunately, prospects for reducing these numbers in 2023 remain grim. This study aims to comprehensively understand the multifaceted factors influencing food security among refugees amid the ongoing global humanitarian crisis of forced displacement. By focusing on the geographic origins of refugees and their destinations in various host countries — including the United States, Germany, France, Great Britain, Canada, and Switzerland — the research aims to uncover the intricate interplay between cultural preferences, environmental contexts, and the distinctive attributes of host nations. The study delves into the challenges faced by refugees during their journeys across different territories, considering the substantial cultural, climatic, and religious differences encountered. Specifically, it scrutinizes how these differences impact food accessibility, cooking practices, and social dietary norms, consequently shaping the overall food security status of displaced populations. Multiple contributing factors that significantly affect refugee food security are identified within this research. These encompass legislative readiness, cultural and religious influences on dietary preferences, gender disparities, infrastructure availability, healthcare accessibility, environmental adaptation, employment opportunities, education access, food aid availability, and legal status. The study recognizes the intricate interconnectedness of these elements, forming a complex network that necessitates detailed examination and analysis. Through a comparative analysis between refugees' food security in Ukraine and those relocated to Switzerland, the study sheds light on the alarming levels of food insecurity prevalent in both regions. Despite a global trend of heightened insecurity, the research uncovers a particularly acute set of food-related challenges faced by refugees in Switzerland compared to those remaining in Ukraine. These challenges manifest in reduced meal sizes, skipped meals, hunger episodes, and financial constraints hindering food purchases, particularly prominent in Switzerland. Utilizing statistical methodologies like Pearson correlation coefficients, the study highlights the profound impact of gender, household size, age, and education levels on refugee food security. Notably, the study observes that pre-war income did not demonstrably affect food security levels among the displaced population. To address these critical issues, the study proposes a comprehensive strategy encompassing a decade-long survey in Ukraine, thorough data and policy analyses, educational integration, and the formulation of practical recommendations. The overarching goal is to catalyze meaningful, tangible changes in refugee food security by amalgamating rigorous research, in-depth analysis, stakeholder engagement, and educational initiatives to effectuate substantial transformations in this vital domain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.226
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRegional Socio-Economic Development TrendsFrench-language works237,207