MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392754094 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-14211

Release and turn-over of carbon, nitrogen and metals under oxic and suboxic conditions in long-term incubations of Skagerrak sediments 

2024· preprint· en· W4392754094 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Siems, Tina Sanders, Tristan Zimmermann, Michael E. Wieser, Daniel Pröfrock

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitrogenTerm (time)OceanographyCarbon fibersEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceChemistryGeologyMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Suspended particulate matter and associated pollutants from the entire North Sea are deposited in the Skagerrak, located between Norway and Denmark. Consequently, the sediments of the Skagerrak play a key role for long-term carbon storage within the North Sea. Due to its location and bathymetry, the bottom sediment redox conditions within the Skagerrak are heterogeneous and cover a wide range from oxic to suboxic conditions. We investigated nitrogen sequestration processes and the mobility of pollutants in these sediments during incubation experiments that simulated oxic and suboxic conditions. Analysis of isotopic fractionation was used as a tool to better understand the nitrogen sequestration pathways (δ15NO3-) and redox conditions (δ98/95Mo).Typically, incubation experiments last days to weeks but do not cover long-term effects. In contrast, we incubated different zones of three sediment cores with North Sea water for up to twelve months. The sediments originated from locations with (a) mainly iron reduction, (b) mainly manganese reduction and (c) both iron and manganese reduction. After one, three, six and twelve months, we sampled water and sediments from the incubations for various parameters (e.g., trace elements, carbon and nitrogen content, nutrients, δ15NO3-, δ98/95Mo). Under aerobic conditions, the sediments with high organic carbon content (2.78 ± 0.05 %) released up to 33 ± 6 µmol g‑1 NO3- during remineralization, while in anaerobic incubations, these sediments released only up to 4.8 ± 0.8 µmol g-1 NH4+. However, sediments with lower organic carbon contents (1.89 ± 0.05 %) released only 4.8 ± 1.2 µmol g‑1 NO3- and 1.18 ± 0.19 µmol g-1 NH4+, respectively. In combination with trace element concentrations, δ98/95Mo ratios allowed to distinct between different organic matter oxidation pathways. The aerobic incubations released mainly copper, lead and nickel while under anaerobic conditions, also cobalt but significantly less copper has been released. Hence, the prevailing oxygen conditions also have a strong impact on the remobilization of e.g., legacy pollutants stored in the sediments. The results of our long-term incubations reveal important biogeochemical processes and indicate that some processes are only traceable at larger timescales applied in this study, but not by incubation durations that are usually applied for biogeochemical studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→