MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392755628 · doi:10.33423/jabe.v26i1.6864

The Role of Intellectual Capital on Hospital Performance: Evidence at Facility-Level

2024· article· en· W4392755628 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mark Chun, Michael P. Seagraves, Charla Griffy‐Brown, Doug Leigh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Business and Economics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIntellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntellectual capitalBottleneckConstruct (python library)ProductivityAffect (linguistics)BusinessCapital (architecture)Sample (material)Social capitalQuality (philosophy)Structural capitalIndividual capitalIndustrial organizationMarketingKnowledge managementHuman capitalPsychologyOperations managementFinancial capitalEconomicsEconomic growthFinanceSociologySocial scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the social capital theory, this study argues that intellectual capital, defined as knowledge and capabilities within the organization, significantly affect hospital performance. This study examines the impact of intellectual capital on four key hospitals’ performance metrics, i.e. quality, productivity, length of stay, and satisfaction. Using a sample of 34 hospital facilities’ operational reports to construct hospital performance and individual-level survey of 143 individuals across these 34 facilities to construct intellectual capital during 2018, this study finds that intellectual capital significantly increases employee productivity and reduces patient stay length. This study contributes to the literature by providing evidence that intellectual capital plays an important role in reducing bottleneck for hospitals to meet increasing demand in healthcare services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Business and EconomicsSame topicIntellectual Capital and Performance AnalysisFrench-language works237,207