Vertical and spatial distribution of Chloromethane and Bromomethane from boundary layer to upper troposphere over the Amazon rainforest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chloromethane (CH3Cl, average ambient mixing ratio 546 ppt (1)) and Bromomethane (CH3Br, average ambient mixing ratio 6.52 ppt (1)) are the most abundant chlorine-, respective bromine-containing atmospheric trace gases from natural origin. Due to their relatively long tropospheric lifetimes (0.9 y; 0.8 y respectively (2)), they are significant carriers of chlorine and bromine into the stratosphere, where they are photolyzed and contribute to the catalytic destruction of ozone. Chloromethane is mainly emitted by tropical vegetation and soils, biomass burning and from oceans. Vegetation and soils have been shown to act as both, source and sink for Chloromethane. Bromomethane has anthropogenic and biogenic sources, including oceans, fumigation, biomass and fossil fuel burning, crops and vegetation. For both methyl halides the known tropospheric sinks, such as reaction with hydroxyl radicals, loss to soils and oceans, and loss to the stratosphere, do not balance the currently known sources. In particular the strengths of the tropical sources still have substantial uncertainties. Due to the Montreal Protocol, anthropogenic emissions of chlorine and bromine compounds are declining. Therefore, biogenic contributions will become an even more important fraction of the global budget in the following decades. A better understanding of the mechanisms behind emission and tropospheric distribution of Chloro- and Bromomethane is essential to improve predictions of future stratospheric ozone levels.Here, we present the first airborne measurements of Chloromethane and Bromomethane over a tropical forest covering altitudes from the planetary boundary layer to the upper troposphere (300 – 14000 m). The measurements were conducted in Dec 2022 and Jan 2023 over the Amazon Rainforest with the German research aircraft HALO (High Altitude Long Range) in the scope of the CAFE-Brazil campaign. Chloromethane, Bromomethane and other Halocarbons and VOC were measured with Fast GC-MS with a time resolution of 3 minutes. On average elevated levels of both species were found in the boundary layer. Interestingly, the vertical distribution of both compounds also showed a layer with elevated mixing ratios in the upper troposphere, generating a C-shaped profile. The mean Chloromethane mixing ratio reached a maximum of 590 ± 30 ppt between 11 - 12 km altitude, whereas for Bromomethane the maximum appears to be higher than 14 km (where 11.8 ± 1.9 ppt were observed) and thus outside the covered altitude range. The high local convective activity and that of the more distant ITCZ may explain these observations. Surprisingly, high variability of mixing ratios in the boundary layer (300 – 1000 m) with seasonal and regional trends for both methyl halides was observed. Chloromethane mixing ratios between 499 and 686 ppt were observed, in agreement with earlier works which report that the rainforest (including vegetation and soil) can act as source and sink of Chloromethane. Bromomethane mixing ratios in the boundary layer varied between 6.0 to 20.9 ppt, indicating the rainforest to be a source of Bromomethane. (1) World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2022. Geneva; 2022. Report No.: 278.(2) World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2018. Geneva; 2018. Report No.: 58.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".