Datasets and tools for local and global meteorological ensemble estimation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ensemble gridded meteorological datasets are critical for driving hydrology and land models, enabling uncertainty analysis, and supporting a variety of hydroclimate research and applications. The Gridded Meteorological Ensemble Tool (GMET) has been a significant contributor in this domain, offering an accessible platform for generating ensemble precipitation and temperature datasets. The GMET methodology has continually evolved since its initial development in 2006, primarily in the form of a FORTRAN code base, and has since been utilized to generate historical and real-time ensemble meteorological (model forcing) datasets in the U.S. and part of Canada. A recent adaptation of GMET was used to produce multi-decadal forcing datasets for North America and the globe (EMDNA and EM-Earth, respectively). Those datasets have been used to support diverse hydrometeorological applications such as streamflow forecasting and hydroclimate studies across various scales. GMET has now evolved into a Python package called the Geospatial Probabilistic Estimation Package (GPEP), which offers methodological and technical enhancements relative to GMET. These include greater variable selection flexibility, intrinsic parallelization, and especially a broader suite of estimation methods, including the use of techniques from the scikit-learn machine learning library. GPEP enables a wider variety of strategies for local and global estimation of geophysical variables beyond traditional hydrological forcings. This presentation summarizes GPEP and introduces major open-access ensemble datasets that have been generated with GMET and GPEP, including a new effort to create high-resolution (2 km) surface meteorological analyses for the US. These resources are useful in advancing hydrometeorological uncertainty analysis and geospatial estimation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".