MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392759367 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-14307

Observing the fate of methane utilizing Ocean Network Canada's cabled seafloor NEPTUNE Observatory

2024· preprint· en· W4392759367 on OpenAlexaffabout
Martin Scherwath, Michael Riedel, Yann Marcon, Miriam Römer, Laurenz Thomsen, Autun Purser, Damianos Chatzievangelou, Cherisse Du Preez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaOcean Networks Canada SocietyUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeptuneSeafloor spreadingObservatoryAstrobiologyMethaneGeologyOceanographyEnvironmental sciencePlanetAstronomyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cabled ocean observatories enable permanent continuous observations in situ in addition to regular sampling during observatory maintenance expeditions, which allow for some of the most comprehensive monitoring to understand the fate of methane all the way from below the seafloor (with instrumented boreholes), through the seafloor (with bottom sensors, cameras or cabled vehicles) into the water column (with sonars). Ocean Networks Canada is operating the NEPTUNE observatory off the coast of Vancouver Island since 2009 with two of its instrument nodes at gas hydrate sites. The first site, Clayoquot Slope, is at around 1200 m water depth and is a site of high fluid expulsion including large amounts of methane gas seepage, which has been observed for over a decade with permanent sonar scanning. The second site, Barkley Canyon, is at about 900 m water depth and has hydrate mounds with exposed gas hydrate on the seafloor, and is unique for its thermogenic methane and also oil seepage, and the most important observations have been made by a remotely-operated cabled and instrumented a seafloor crawler called Wally. This presentation will provide a few highlights on gas hydrate observations and invites the research community for new ideas how to expand the use of the permanent and continuous data flow opportunities that stem from the 24/7 presence of power and communication availability at the two different hydrate sights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.797
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→