The Impact of Initiating Dividend Payments on Shareholders’ Wealth: Evidence from Egypt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose – The goal of this study is to look into how signaling and dividend policy affect stock market values. Design/methodology/approach – Ten firms that are listed on the Egyptian Exchange (EGX-30) and (EGX-70) are taken as a sample for the period 2017-2021. Provided data on dividend announcement signaling over five years was computed using a 20-day window from the announcement date to the Ex-Coupon date for the specified duration. The study uses Eviews-12’s Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) for dynamic panel models to examine how dividend policy and signaling impact stock market prices are related. Findings – The findings reveal, that Dividend payments have a significant positive signaling effect on stock prices in the Egyptian Stock Market. Research limitations/implications – This study fills the research gap in the Egyptian context specifically, as well as globally by providing important insights into the relationship between a firm’s dividend policy and shareholders’ wealth. However, because this study is based in Egypt, the generalizability of the results would be limited. Practical implications – The study’s conclusions can assist business management in formulating dividend policies that will optimize shareholder wealth. Additionally, this study gives investors direction and information on which businesses to invest in to increase their wealth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".