Hypothesis of Concerted Reactivity of Singlet Non-Covalent Radical Dimers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work explores the intriguing domain of Frustrated Radical Pairs (FRPs) and their potential to form non-covalent dimers, termed Entangled Radical Pairs (ERPs), which exhibit unique singlet ground states and potential concerted reactivity, differing from traditional stepwise reactions. A few recent publications showed that in certain cases when two radicals cannot form a covalent bond, they unexpectedly form a non-covalent dimer with a singlet ground state. This potentially opens a new elusive route of FRPs’ reactivity, in which both radicals react simultaneously as one molecule. Here, we review several published articles, in which such reactivity probably took place, but was overlooked. The idea presented in this proposal suggests a path towards many interesting reactions, such as low-temperature metal-free dehydrogenation of aliphatic hydrocarbons and others. Additionally, an alternative mechanism for the reactivity of Frustrated Lewis Pairs (FLPs) based on the ERP framework is proposed. Lastly, the implications of the ERP model on the general theory of chemical bond formation are contemplated, suggesting a revision of the traditional views on hybridization and electron entanglement. The manuscript calls for further experimental and theoretical investigations to substantiate the presented hypotheses, aiming to unlock new pathways in radical chemistry and beyond.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".