MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392762226 · doi:10.1117/12.3001248

Towards non-contact and real-time large field-of-view single-band Raman spectroscopy imaging in brain cancer surgery

2024· article· en· W4392762226 on OpenAlexaff
Frédéric Leblond, Sandryne David, Samaneh Pahlavani, Nassim Ksantini, F. Dallaire, Guillaume Sheehy, Costas Hadjapanayis, Kevin Petrecca, Brian C. Wilson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingRaman spectroscopyGold standard (test)Brain cancerSensitivity (control systems)SpectroscopyOpticsMaterials scienceNuclear magnetic resonanceBiomedical engineeringComputer scienceCancerPhysicsMedicineRadiologyArtificial intelligenceElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research introduces a new approach based on Raman spectroscopy for quickly and effectively detecting brain tumors at a macroscopic scale, making it suitable for intra-operative use. By focusing on a specific vibrational band at 1440 cm-1 as a cancer biomarker, this method will enable rapid imaging of a field of view spanning several centimeters in approximately 5 seconds. The results of this study demonstrated high sensitivity/specificity for meningioma (97%/95%), brain metastases (95%/91%), and glioblastoma (78%/84%). The performance of this developed imaging system was compared to a custom hyperspectral line-scanning Raman system as the gold standard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207