Determination of two structures of the solvent 3-hydroxypropionitrile crystallized at low temperatures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The title compound, 3-hydroxypropionitrile, was crystallized repeatedly in situ inside a quartz capillary using a liquid nitrogen cryostream. The X-ray powder diffraction patterns obtained indicated the presence of two distinct crystalline phases. The cleanest datasets for each of the phases were used to solve the crystal structures via simulated annealing, followed by refinement and optimization via dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT) calculations, with a final Rietveld refinement against the experimental data. The two structures appear to correspond to those proposed in a 1960s literature vibrational spectroscopy paper, one being the more stable with a gauche molecular conformation and the second metastable phase more complex with mixed conformations. Dispersion-corrected DFT computation using lattice parameters for both phases obtained from a single 84 K dataset with co-existing phases shows the stable and metastable phases to differ in energy by less than 0.5 kJ mol −1 . A comparison of experimental far infrared spectra published in the 1960s with those calculated from the proposed crystal structures provides some independent supporting evidence for the proposed structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".