MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392767956 · doi:10.56315/pscf3-24finlay

God’s Gift of Science: Theological Presuppositions Underlying Exploration of the Natural World

2024· article· en· W4392767956 on OpenAlex
Graeme J. Finlay

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspectives on Science and Christian Faith · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Ecology, and Ethics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresuppositionNatural (archaeology)Natural sciencePhilosophyEpistemologyTheologyEnvironmental ethicsSociologyHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GOD'S GIFT OF SCIENCE: Theological Presuppositions Underlying Exploration of the Natural World by Graeme Finlay. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2022. 156 pages. Paperback; $22.00. ISBN: 9781666748062. *Graeme Finlay has had a long career as a cancer researcher and teacher of scientific pathology at the University of Auckland, New Zealand. *Many different books have approached the very critical topic of science and faith over the last twenty years. Polling research has shown that one of the principal reasons that young people leave churches, and their faith, is due to a perceived conflict between these two. It is a topic that should concern us all, and it is very important that it be approached from a variety of perspectives. *The particular approach of Finlay is not predominantly as an academic expert in the history of science, nor as one who is principally interested in winning critical debate points in the science and faith dialogue, but as a scientist who has lived this out and deeply studied it at a personal level. Finlay links his understanding of science, including its history and philosophy, to the very nature and personality of God. One can sense the spiritual depths of his personal faith in his writings. The beauty of this book is that it brings a deep understanding of science and connects its deep mysteries with the nature and character of God. I have read and studied many books on the topic of science and faith, but have yet to see one presented in such an evidently personal way. *One could look at the book with a strictly academic eye and focus on missing arguments or insufficient detail in some of the reflections, but that would be to miss the point. At some level, we need to step back from the mountains of information and make the science/faith discussion real at the personal level, not just in our minds, but also in our hearts and in our own faith walk. That is the real value of this book. *Finlay's book is divided into six chapters. The first chapter, "Science is Not Self-Sufficient," examines the nature and limits of science. He quotes Nietzsche, "Strictly speaking, there is no such thing as science "without any presuppositions" ... a philosophy, a "faith" must always be there first, so that science can acquire from it a direction, a meaning, a limit, a method, a right to exist ... It is still a metaphysical faith that underlies our faith in science (p. 11)." *Finlay then himself states, "If we are to live truthfully, we should seek to discover the worldview that sustains and informs the scientific enterprise" (p. 11). This turns out to be the core truth that drives the entire book. *The second chapter, "One Source of Creation," relates science to the nature of God. God is almighty, wise, ordered, faithful, free, creative, holy, and redeeming. He speaks to us and is to be worshipped. Although each of these is treated as a small vignette, the sum total of the chapter makes the very significant point that science has emanated from, and is an integral part of, the very quality and character of God. The science that we observe and study is meant to bring us into relationship with him. This is the principal and most powerful contribution of this book. *Chapter three, "Science and the Nature of Humanity," outlines some of the social progress that has been brought about by people of faith. He relates this to humanity being made in the image of God (imago Dei) and the biblical nature of work for the person of faith. He examines the elimination of slavery, as well as contributions to medicine and education/literacy. This part mostly reads as a historical examination of the influence of the Christian faith on social progress. I would have been very interested to see how he views the role of faith in more-contemporary topics of social discourse. *Chapter four, "The Death of Science," outlines how the author views the future of scientific endeavor in the absence of a strong spiritual faith foundation. He quotes Thorson, "If the age of science comes to an end, it will really be because people collectively have not cherished and sustained that practicing faith in the reality and authority of truth" (p. 64). Finlay is convinced of this and understands the "growing threats to science in deeply theological terms" (p. 64). He discusses the influence of powerful special interest groups, such as the tobacco industry's connection to cancer and the fossil fuel industry to climate change, as examples where strong commercial interests can undermine science. He is concerned that the moral underpinnings of science are weakening and that we need "to return to God on whose truth science is most securely founded" (p. 68). *Chapter five, "Discovery in Theology and Science: Surprise," is an attempt to relate scientific discovery to elements of surprise as seen in some passages in scripture. Although one can readily agree with the premise that the surprise of scientific discovery is related to the mystery of God, this part felt labored and did not really work in my opinion. The most interesting part of the chapter was the surprise/discovery he experienced in his own research on cancer drug research and how that relates to God. *Chapter six, "Science and Theology in Sustainability and Justice," is almost entirely an examination of the severe consequences and implications of climate change. This final chapter has the objective of bringing everything up to the modern day and underlines our responsibility to the planet as people of faith. Although this is well referenced and is interesting, it is surprising that the author did not spend more time on his own scientific discipline--it would have been very interesting to have heard his insights about the future of cancer research, its impact on humanity, and the role of faith. *Finlay's book principally treats the question of why science needs faith, and that is done quite well. One part that was missing is the misunderstanding of science within the church itself, and the dangers that arise in faith communities when faith is dissociated from science. I would have loved to have heard some of his personal thoughts on this. *The book is highly footnoted, and the sources are quoted heavily. This significantly adds to the book, especially in the areas where Finlay is not an academic expert. Many of the references are not particularly recent, but I have come away with a list of books I want to read. Overall, this is an excellent book that will stimulate thinking in the area of science and faith and touch the reader's heart at the same time. I haven't marked up a book to this extent for a long time. *Reviewed by Basil D. Favis, Emeritus Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, University of Montréal, QC H3T 1J4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.018
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it