Harmonic wave scattered by an inclusion in an elastic plane: The complete Gurtin-Murdoch model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the propagation of a harmonic elastic wave in a composite inclusion–matrix structure subjected to plane deformation. The interface between the inclusion and matrix is described by the complete Gurtin-Murdoch model with non-vanishing interface tension and interface stretching rigidity. We consider an inclusion of general shape and formulate the corresponding boundary value problem for the wave functions in the inclusion and matrix when a harmonic compressional or shear wave is incident on the edge of the matrix. The problem is then solved by series expansion methods for the case of a circular inclusion embedded in an infinite matrix. The series solution obtained is validated by checking its convergence and via comparisons with existing static and dynamic solutions for certain reduced cases. Numerical examples are presented for the case of a small-sized circular hole embedded in a soft matrix demonstrating the influence of surface tension on the incident wave-induced dynamic stress concentration in the matrix. We find that the presence of surface tension relieves the peak stress around the circular hole when the frequency of the incident wave is below a certain critical value, while it tends to intensify the peak stress for a high-frequency incident wave.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".