Characteristics of pulse oximetry and arterial blood gas in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is frequently associated with abnormal oxygenation; however, little is known about the accuracy of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO 2 ) compared with arterial blood gas (ABG) saturation (SaO 2 ), the factors that influence the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO 2 ) and the impact of PaCO 2 on outcomes in patients with fibrotic ILD. Study design and methods Patients with fibrotic ILD enrolled in a large prospective registry with a room air ABG were included. Prespecified analyses included testing the correlation between SaO 2 and SpO 2 , the difference between SaO 2 and SpO 2 , the association of baseline characteristics with both the difference between SaO 2 and SpO 2 and the PaCO 2 , the association of baseline characteristics with acid-base category, and the association of PaCO 2 and acid-base category with time to death or transplant. Results A total of 532 patients with fibrotic ILD were included. Mean resting SaO 2 was 92±4% and SpO 2 was 95±3%. Mean PaCO 2 was 38±6 mmHg, with 135 patients having PaCO 2 <35 mmHg and 62 having PaCO 2 >45 mmHg. Correlation between SaO 2 and SpO 2 was mild to moderate (r=0.39), with SpO 2 on average 3.0% higher than SaO 2 . No baseline characteristics were associated with the difference in SaO 2 and SpO 2 . Variables associated with either elevated or abnormal (elevated or low) PaCO 2 included higher smoking pack-years and lower baseline forced vital capacity (FVC). Lower baseline lung function was associated with an increased risk of chronic respiratory acidosis. PaCO 2 and acid-base status were not associated with time to death or transplant. Interpretation SaO 2 and SpO 2 are weakly-to-moderately correlated in fibrotic ILD, with limited ability to accurately predict this difference. Abnormal PaCO 2 was associated with baseline FVC but was not associated with outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".