MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392772138 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3992886/v1

Optimizing Recommender Model: Integrating Knowledge Graph Information Fusion and Attention Mechanism

2024· preprint· en· W4392772138 on OpenAlexaff
Liam Patel, Lucien Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecommender systemMechanism (biology)Computer scienceGraphFusionInformation retrievalArtificial intelligenceTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Graphs are versatile for capturing relationships between objects, as seen in social networks, enabling the implementation of algorithms like community discovery and clustering. The growing interest in deep learning within the graph domain has led to the development of various graph neural network algorithms in recent years. These algorithms offer an effective solution to address graph learning challenges by incorporating graph operations into traditional deep learning models and leveraging both graph structure and attribute information to handle the intricacies of graph data. Graph neural network algorithms represent an extension of traditional deep learning methods, like convolution, into the realm of graph data. These algorithms incorporate the concept of data propagation to formulate deep learning approaches specifically designed for graphs. Notably, they have demonstrated success in diverse domains such as social networks, recommendation systems, knowledge graphs, and others. In addressing the aforementioned challenges, this paper introduces a novel approach utilizing a graph neural network. To overcome the lack of temporal information in the recommendation network's neighbor structure, an ordered input-based gated cyclic unit is incorporated for state aggregation and updating. The model leverages the unit's capacity for capturing contextual relationships, thereby enhancing its ability to capture temporal features in the neighbor structure and improve predictions on new datasets. Additionally, the paper places emphasis on the shallow output of the intermediate layer. A multi-headed attention mechanism is employed to integrate information from multiple layers of output, ensuring that the shallow structural features provided by the intermediate layer play a more significant role in the scoring prediction task. This enhancement further refines the application of graph neural networks in recommendation systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207