MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392774052 · doi:10.4271/2023-01-5132

Proposal for Gemba-Kaizen Implementation to Enhance Efficiency in the Medium-Scale Bus Body Fabrication Industry

2024· article· en· W4392774052 on OpenAlexaff
S. Balakrishnan, V. Rajkumar, J. Jerold John Britto

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKaizenManufacturing engineeringComputer scienceScale (ratio)FabricationEngineeringLean manufacturing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The basic needs of people are met by the building, fabric, and farming sectors. In addition, the automobile industry significantly contributes to human mobility and is essential to India’s economic expansion. There are numerous research strategies available to improve the bus body building industries. Several investigative approaches for enhancing bus body building industries are available. However, several of these studies merely look at it from the perspective of shop floor activity. Accordingly, when it comes to the execution of process design approaches, there is little practical evidence for accepting Gemba kaizen’s attitude. Hence, the purpose of this article is to present a continuous improvement redesign framework tailored to a specific bus body building industrial sector. The proposed model is structured after a critical examination of Gemba and Kaizen. The results showed that by implementing the improvement initiatives, the number of process activities decreased from 44 to 25 (of which 43% were wasteful), and the cycle time decreased from an average of 112 hours to 68 hours, or 39% faster. The outcomes also show how the suggested model helped organizations reduce resource usage and enhance organizational effectiveness.</div></div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207