MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392775142 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3968715/v1

Sweeping effects on curling and friction estimation

2024· preprint· en· W4392775142 on OpenAlexaff
Hinako Sonobe, Yamato Aoki, Osuke Miya, Kei Murata, Eri Ogihara, Yasuaki Okawara, Sachi Ozaki, Nishiki Tomizawa, J. Murata

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWinter Sports Injuries and Performance
Canadian institutionsSaint Paul University
FundersRikkyo University
KeywordsCurlingEstimationEconomicsMechanical engineeringEngineeringManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Sweeping using brushes in curling games is widely performed not only to extend the stone-stopping range but also to control curls, although little scientific evidence supports the curl-controlling effects. In this study, we performed a measurement to examine the effects by developing a stone-shooting machine-SSM-I. Additionally, a simple method for measuring friction in split time is proposed. The results suggested the positive effects of left-right asymmetric sweeping with 95% reliability for sweeping on the opposite half-side to assist curling. We also confirmed the effect of stopping-range extension with 99% reliability. Along with stone checking and inspecting their bottom roughness, SSM-I can assist in assessing the friction conditions of ice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicWinter Sports Injuries and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207