MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392777552 · doi:10.1101/2024.03.11.24304114

Effects of silver diamine fluoride on oral bacteriome and mycobiome: a randomized clinical trial

2024· preprint· en· W4392777552 on OpenAlexaff
Mayura Manerkar, Vivianne Cruz de Jesus, Betty-Anne Mittermuller, Victor H. K. Lee, Sarbjeet Singh, Mary Bertone, Prashen Chelikani, Robert J. Schroth

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral microbiology and periodontitis research
Canadian institutionsManitoba HealthUniversity of ManitobaChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarly childhood cariesRegimenRandomized controlled trialMedicineMicrobiomeCarious lesionDentistryInternal medicineGastroenterologyBiologyEnamel paintBioinformaticsOral health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is a simple and non-invasive agent used to arrest early childhood caries (ECC). This study aimed to investigate potential changes to the oral microbiome in children with ECC who were treated with SDF at three different frequency regimens. Methods Forty-five children ( n =15 per group) with ECC were recruited into a randomized clinical trial testing three different treatment frequency regimens of SDF. A total of 195 carious lesions were treated with two applications of 38% SDF and 5% sodium fluoride varnish (NaFV) and assessed over three study visits (one month (Regimen 1M), four months (Regimen 4M), or six months (Regimen 6M) apart). Dental plaque samples were collected at each visit. Sequencing of the V4- 16S rRNA and ITS1 rRNA genes were used to study the supragingival plaque microbiome. Results The overall arrest rates for treated carious lesions were 75.9% at Visit 2 and 92.8% at Visit 3. Arrest rates were higher for all lesions after two applications of SDF with NaFV, and applications one month and four months apart had higher arrest rates (95.9% and 98.5%) than six months (81.1%) apart. The microbial diversity analyses showed no significant differences in the overall microbiome after SDF treatment. However, significant changes in the abundance of specific bacteria and fungi, particularly Lactobacillus spp. , Bifidobacterium spp., and Candida spp. were observed after treatment. Furthermore, overabundance of Streptococcus mutans and Candida dubliniensis at baseline was observed in children who had at least one caries lesion not arrested after one SDF application, compared to those who had 100% arrest rates. Conclusion SDF with NaFV applications were an effective modality for arresting ECC, with higher arrest rates after two SDF applications. No loss of diversity but significant changes in the abundance of specific bacteria and fungi were consequences of SDF treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicOral microbiology and periodontitis research→French-language works237,207→