MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392784251 · doi:10.33087/jiubj.v24i1.4900

Peran Kader Posyandu dalam Upaya Pencegahan Stunting pada Ibu Badutadi Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur

2024· article· en· W4392784251 on OpenAlexaff
Nuralamfajar Nuralamfajar, Novrikasari Novrikasari, Ika Astuti

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hindering is a state of inability to flourish in youngsters under five years of age (babies under 5 years of age) which is brought about by tenacious lack of healthy sustenance so the kid is excessively short for his age. Lack of healthy sustenance happens when the child is in the belly and toward the start of the child's introduction to the world, however hindering most actually shows up after the youngster is two years of age. In view of SSGI records for 2021, it is known that in Jambi Territory the most elevated frequency of hindering is in Muaro Jambi Rule (27.2%) and the least is in Jambi City, for East Tanjung Jabung Regime it is 25.6%, better than the benefit of Jambi Area (22.4%). This examination is a quantitative exploration with a sectional methodology. The Geragai District served as the location of the research area. The ideal opportunity for leading the examination was in December 2022 with a populace of 574 moms with Baduta youngsters (old 0-23 months) and an example of 132. A progression of accounts utilizing a poll were then examined univariately, bivariately and multivariately utilizing chi-square. In view of the examination results, there is a connection between the job of posyandu units with a p-worth of 0.000 on forestalling hindering by female youngsters in East Tanjung Jabung Rule in 2022.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari JambiSame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207