MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392787448 · doi:10.2118/219463-pa

Adsorption Characteristics of CO2/CH4/H2S Mixtures in Calcite Nanopores with the Implications for CO2 Sequestration

2024· article· en· W4392787448 on OpenAlexaff
Zhenhua Rui, Cheng Qian, Yueliang Liu, Yang Zhao, Huazhou Li, Andrey Afanasyev, Farshid Torabi

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsPetroleum Technology Research CentreUniversity of ReginaUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalciteNanoporeAdsorptionCarbon sequestrationChemical engineeringCarbon dioxideCo2 removalPetroleum engineeringMaterials scienceChemistryGeologyMineralogyNanotechnologyEngineeringPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Injecting CO2 into reservoirs for storage and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is a practical and cost-effective strategy for reducing carbon emissions. Commonly, CO2-rich industrial waste gas is used as the CO2 source, whereas contaminants such as H2S may severely impact carbon storage and EOR via competitive adsorption. Hence, the adsorption behavior of CH4, CO2, and H2S in calcite (CaCO3) micropores and the impact of H2S on CO2 sequestration and methane recovery are specifically investigated. The Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations were applied to study the adsorption characteristics of pure CO2, CH4, and H2S, and their multicomponent mixtures were also investigated in CaCO3 nanopores to reveal the impact of H2S on CO2 storage. The effects of pressure (0–20 MPa), temperature (293.15–383.15 K), pore width, buried depth, and gas mole fraction on the adsorption behaviors are simulated. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed to explore the diffusion characteristics of the three gases and their mixes. The amount of adsorbed CH4, CO2, and H2S enhances with rising pressure and declines with rising temperature. The order of adsorption quantity in CaCO3 nanopores is H2S > CO2 > CH4 based on the adsorption isotherm. At 10 MPa and 323.15 K, the interaction energies of CaCO3 with CO2, H2S, and CH4 are −2166.40 kcal/mol, −2076.93 kcal/mol, and −174.57 kcal/mol, respectively, which implies that the order of adsorption strength between the three gases and CaCO3 is CO2 > H2S > CH4. The CH4-CaCO3 and H2S-CaCO3 interaction energies are determined by van der Waals energy, whereas electrostatic energy predominates in the CO2-CaCO3 system. The adsorption loading of CH4 and CO2 are lowered by approximately 59.47% and 24.82% when the mole fraction of H2S is 20% at 323.15 K, reflecting the weakening of CH4 and CO2 adsorption by H2S due to competitive adsorption. The diffusivities of three pure gases in CaCO3 nanopore are listed in the following order: CH4 > H2S ≈ CO2. The presence of H2S in the ternary mixtures will limit diffusion and outflow of the system and each single gas, with CH4 being the gas most affected by H2S. Concerning carbon storage in CaCO3 nanopores, the CO2/CH4 binary mixture is suitable for burial in shallower formations (around 1000 m) to maximize the storage amount, while the CO2/CH4/H2S ternary mixture should be buried as deep as possible to minimize the adverse effects of H2S. The effects of H2S on CO2 sequestration and CH4 recovery in CaCO3 nanopores are clarified, which provides theoretical assistance for CO2 storage and EOR projects in carbonate formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE JournalSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207