Vers une logique « véritablement » durable de la supply chain : élaboration d’un cadre conceptuel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La supply chain durable est devenue une stratégie permettant à de nombreuses entreprises de s’engager sur une voie durable. Cependant, la logique instrumentale, qui domine le contexte de la supply chain (SC), entraîne souvent la primauté de la composante économique sur la dimension environnementale et sociale. Pourtant, une logique de durabilité véritable (« true sustainability logic ») peut émerger comme une alternative de changement. Néanmoins, nous en savons peu sur la manière dont cette nouvelle logique peut émerger. Pour combler cette lacune, cet article conceptuel présente un cadre complet avec 9 propositions de recherche sur la maniére dont les pratiques des entreprises et leurs SC peuvent passer d’une logique instrumentale à une logique de true sustainability. Pour illustrer nos propositions de recherche, nous utiliserons l’exemple de deux entreprises qui, malgré l’existence de pratiques ancrées dans une logique instrumentale, sont en train de mettre en oeuvre un fort engagement vers la logique de true sustainability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.023 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".