MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392791306 · doi:10.1093/english/efae003

The politics of death in Nnedi Okorafor’s Africanfuturist Novels

2023· article· en· W4392791306 on OpenAlexaff
Ifeoluwa Adeniyi

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish Journal of the English Association · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsArtPolitical scienceLiteratureHistoryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This essay discusses the politics of death in Nnedi Okorafor’s early novels, Who Fears Death and The Book of Phoenix, not least because both novels are linked and underscore the writer’s commitments to necropolitics. Both novels also highlight death worlds founded on genocides and the eradication of minoritized and racialized bodies. I show that Okorafor’s artistic commitments in both works are organized around a critique of the necropolitical conditions of past and contemporary imperial world orders. At the heart of this critique is the Black woman, whom Okorafor positions at the crucial interfaces of alternative future worlds founded on visions of martyrdom and renewal/transfiguration as necessary in the struggle against necropower.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish Journal of the English AssociationSame topicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionFrench-language works237,207