Characterisation of <i>Skoliomonas</i> gen. nov., a haloalkaliphilic anaerobe related to barthelonids (Metamonada)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Metamonads are a large and exclusively anaerobic clade of protists. Additionally, metamonads are one of the three clades with a proposed ‘excavate’ ancestral cell morphology, characterised by a conspicuous ventral groove often accompanied by a posterior flagellum with a vane. Here, we characterise four isolates of an anaerobic bacterivorous flagellate from hypersaline and alkaline soda lake environments, which represents a novel clade. Small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene phylogenies support recent phylogenomic analyses in placing this clade as the sister group to Barthelona spp., a lineage that is itself sister to or deeply branching within Fornicata (Metamonada). The cells have a distinctive morphology comprised of a hunchbacked cell body with a narrow twisting ventral groove ending in a large opening to a conspicuous cytopharynx curving up the dorsal side of the cell. The right margin of the groove is defined by a thin ‘lip’ that twists slightly to the left towards the posterior. The posterior of the cell ends in a spike up to half a cell body long. The posterior flagellum bears a wide ventral-facing vane. One isolate forms cysts with a complex wall and a single plug. The narrow ventral groove and elongate cytopharynx are shared with barthelonids. We describe one isolate as Skoliomonas litria , gen. et sp. nov. Further investigation of mitochondrial-related organelles (MRO) in Skoliomonas spp. and detailed ultrastructural studies would be important to understanding the evolution of adaptation to anaerobic conditions in Metamonads—especially fornicates—as well as the evolution of the ‘excavate’ groove.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".