MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392792925 · doi:10.1134/s0016793223600601

Performance Analysis of NeQuick-G, IRI-2016, IRI-Plas 2017 and AfriTEC Models over the African Region during the Geomagnetic Storm of March 2015

2023· article· en· W4392792925 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeomagnetism and Aeronomy · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeomagnetic stormEarth's magnetic fieldMeteorologyStormEnvironmental sciencePhysicsMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper investigates the diurnal variations of modelled and observed vertical total electron content (VTEC) over the African region (40° N to +40° S, 25° W to 65° E) obtained from ground-based global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers. The investigations on ionospheric response during the super geomagnetic storm time (March 17 2015) are crucial, especially over African low latitudes. Hence, the performance of ionospheric models has been evaluated in this paper. The VTEC predictability by regional/global ionospheric models (AfriTEC, IRI-2016, IRI-Plas 2017, GIM-CODE, and Nequick-G) is assessed by using root mean square error (RMSE) method and percentage deviation by comparing the GPS/GNSS-VTEC obtained from 10 IGS (International GNSS Service) stations with the modelled-VTEC values over the African region. The peculiarity in VTEC values is evident during the superstorm’s sudden commencement compared to the pre- and post-storm periods. Northern hemisphere GPS station TEC data showed a twin peak in the daily VTEC patterns. The enhanced VTEC values were observed over all the selected 10 IGS stations on the storm day than on other quiet days. Moreover, during the post-storm days (March 18–20, 2015), these VTEC values decreased more than on quiet days over the IGS stations in the southern hemisphere (MBAR, MAYG, HARB, SBOK). On the other hand, during the post-storm days (March 18–20, 2015), the VTEC values remained high over the geomagnetic northern hemisphere (NOT1, SFER, MAS1, CPVG, NKLG). It is worth mentioning that three northern IGS stations (NOT1, SFER, and MAS1) displayed a VTEC increase record of approximately 75–90% due to the extension of equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) during the geomagnetic storm. In contrast, the other northern stations at the EIA trough region (CPVG, BJCO, NKLG) registered a VTEC increment of 7, 26, and 25%, respectively. Southern IGS stations registered an enhancement in VTEC of about 5%. The VTEC maps from AfriTEC, IRI-2016, and Nequick-G were able to predict the feature of EIA at around 20° N/15° S. The GPS-VTEC values at IGS stations located on the geomagnetic EIA crests (in both northern and southern hemispheres) and in the trough (equatorial stations) are higher than those of the IGS stations situated at mid-latitudes. AfriTEC, a regional model, recorded the lowest RMSE values over all the stations. The prediction results show that the regional model performance is better than the global ionospheric models (IRI-2016 and Nequick-G models), especially over EIA latitudes of the African region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score0.702

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it