Should Fludrocortisone be Added to Hydrocortisone in Septic Shock? Probably Yes, Based on Available Evidence*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 The Pulmonary Center, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA. 2 Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. 3 Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 5 Department of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. *See also p. e193. Dr. Bosch is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and the Department of Defense. Dr. Teja is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and by a Merit Award from the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto. Dr. Pereira has disclosed that he does not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".