MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392807541 · doi:10.1063/5.0200092

Aeroelastic characteristics of flexible membrane wings with ceiling effect

2024· article· en· W4392807541 on OpenAlexafffund
Guojun Li, Rajeev K. Jaiman, Biao Lei, Hongzhong Liu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaState Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems EngineeringUniversity of British ColumbiaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhysicsAeroelasticityCeiling (cloud)MechanicsAerospace engineeringAerodynamicsMeteorologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a numerical study to analyze the aeroelastic characteristics of two-dimensional flexible membrane wings subjected to the ceiling effect. A body-fitted variational aeroelastic solver based on the fully coupled Navier–Stokes and nonlinear structural equations is employed to model the coupled fluid-membrane system. The coupled dynamics and the aerodynamic performance of flexible membrane wings with ceiling effect are investigated in a parameter space of angle of attack and ceiling distance. The effect of ceiling distance on the aeroelastic characteristics is examined at pre-stall, near-stall, and stall conditions. The role of flexibility in the coupled system under near-ceiling conditions is investigated by comparing with its rigid flat and cambered counterparts. The effect of no-slip and perfect slip boundary conditions of the ceiling wall is compared to quantify the momentum transport influenced by the ceiling effect. The connection between the aerodynamic loads and the membrane deformation is constructed by two scaling relations presented in our previous studies. The results indicate that the aeroelastic characteristics of the flexible membrane wings under near-ceiling conditions are adjusted from three aspects, namely, (i) the gap to the ceiling, (ii) the wing flexibility, and (iii) the ceiling boundary condition. This study represents a step toward an improved understanding of the aeroelastic characteristics of flexible membrane wings under ceiling conditions with different boundary layer flows. These findings can facilitate the development of high-efficiency bio-inspired micro-air vehicles that have robust flight stability and can perform missions in confined spaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsFrench-language works237,207