MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392813770 · doi:10.29011/2576-957x.100054

Sex and Gender Differences in Health Information Needs for Arthritis Patients

2024· article· en· W4392813770 on OpenAlexaff
Tania Al-Jilawi, Joy C. MacDermid, Katherine Salter, Armaghan Dabbagh

Bibliographic record

VenueChronic Pain & Management · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Media in Health Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoDalhousie UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArthritisMedicinePsychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The onset and progression of both degenerative and inflammatory arthritis can be affected by sex and gender.Both age and gender can affect people's decisions about their health.Men, for instance, may employ fewer, and less varied coping mechanisms than women.Objectives: To focus on the health information needs of arthritis patients and investigate the experiences of arthritis patients from various sexes and genders, as well as how they think their sex and/or gender might influence their health information needs.It also sought to determine whether they would benefit from a health information intervention, and if so, what kind of intervention they would like and how it should be delivered.Methods: This study followed a qualitative approach, interpretive description, where 13 participants were recruited from Roth McFarlane Hand & Upper Limb Centre at St. Joseph's Health Centre.The inclusion criteria were patients with confirmed arthritis aged 18-75, who could speak and understand English, and could consent to participate.Thematic analysis was conducted.Results: Ten overarching themes were identified with various subthemes across 13 transcripts.These themes were: positive therapeutically alliance with physicians, need for online resources, men are more reluctant to seek help, systemic challenges to accessing healthcare, patients' health information needs, perceived facilitators, level of satisfaction with the information or services provided by physicians, gender affects information needs but not the ability to establish a therapeutic alliance, dire need for more access to arthritis information programs, and mixed understanding about the meaning of sex/gender.Conclusion: The demands of patients for health information are influenced by their gender and/or sexual orientation.Given patients' challenges while accessing health information, it is critical to adopt a patient-centred strategy that focuses on their needs and allows them to express their opinions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChronic Pain & ManagementSame topicSocial Media in Health EducationFrench-language works237,207