MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392813871 · doi:10.1177/13524585241238094

Choroid plexus volume differentiates MS from its mimics

2024· article· en· W4392813871 on OpenAlexaff
Elle Levit, Zheng Ren, Virgilio Gonzenbach, Christina Azevedo, Peter A. Calabresi, Bruce Cree, Léorah Freeman, Erin E. Longbrake, Jiwon Oh, Matthew K. Schindler, Nancy L. Sicotte, Daniel S. Reich, Daniel Ontaneda, Pascal Sati, Quy Cao, Russell T. Shinohara, Andrew Solomon

Bibliographic record

VenueMultiple Sclerosis Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeSanofi GenzymeEMD SeronoNational Institutes of HealthIdorsia PharmaceuticalsGenentechMultiple Sclerosis SocietyCommon FundMyelin Repair FoundationHorizon TherapeuticsNational Institute of Mental HealthNGM BiopharmaceuticalsRace to Erase MSTG TherapeuticsPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteBristol-Myers SquibbEli Lilly and CompanyBiogenSanofiNational Multiple Sclerosis Society
KeywordsChoroid plexusMultiple sclerosisMedicineNeuroscienceCentral nervous systemInternal medicinePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to determine whether choroid plexus volume (CPV) could differentiate multiple sclerosis (MS) from its mimics. A secondary analysis of two previously enrolled studies, 50 participants with MS and 64 with alternative diagnoses were included. CPV was automatically segmented from 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), followed by manual review to remove misclassified tissue. Mean normalized choroid plexus volume (nCPV) to intracranial volume demonstrated relatively high specificity for MS participants in each cohort (0.80 and 0.76) with an area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve of 0.71 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.55-0.87) and 0.65 (95% CI = 0.52-0.77). In this preliminary study, nCPV differentiated MS from its mimics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMultiple Sclerosis JournalSame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207