MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392815555 · doi:10.29173/jaed256

Interview with Chief Louie Osoyoos First Nation, British Columbia

2008· article· en· W4392815555 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samuel Baxter

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aboriginal Economic Development · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEditor in chiefPolitical scienceManagementEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sherry: Could you give me a quick update on the major projects you've had since winning the CANDO Economic Developer of the Year award in 2000. Chief Louie:The biggest would be the hundred million dollar Nk'Mip Resort, which includes a hotel (a partnership with Bellstar), a conference center, and the Nk'Mip cellars (a joint venture with Jackson-Triggs of Vincor International).Our cultural centre opened in 2000, along with our recreational vehicle park and our renovated camp ground.And of course, we've updated all of our businesses -they've had additional growth and additional money put into them.Our championship golf course also opened in 2000 on the north end of our reserve, Nk'Mip canyon.Other than that, all of our other businesses have seen growth and additional jobs and we have continued to invest addition capital into our existing companies.Our first off-reserve business purchase also occurred in 2000 when we bought and moved a cement plant on to the reserve.Sherry: Can you give me a quick profile of what's occurring at the moment?Didn't you just sign a mining agreement?Chief Louie: Yes, we just signed our first natural resource agreement.From a mining industry

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0230.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Aboriginal Economic DevelopmentSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207