MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392815583 · doi:10.29173/jaed271

Success of The Unama’ki Economic Benefits Office

2009· article· en· W4392815583 on OpenAlexaff
Owen Fitzgerald

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aboriginal Economic Development · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsFirst Nations University of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgency (philosophy)Executive directorCapetar (computing)Public administrationBusinessManagementPolitical scienceSociologyEconomicsSocial scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today, the President of the Sydney and Area Chamber of Commerce (completed twoyear term as president on May 20) works in Membertou as the Executive Director of the Unama'ki Economic Benefits Office. The aim was to identify how Unama'ki communities could have meaningful participation in the $400 million Sydney Tar Ponds Cleanup project. The proposal called for the provincial and federal governments to partner with Cape Breton's five First Nation communities in establishing the Unama'ki Economic Benefits Office. The office acts as a liaison between the aboriginal communities, both aboriginal and nonaboriginal businesses, and the Sydney Tar Ponds Agency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Aboriginal Economic DevelopmentSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207