Bibliographic record
Abstract
The employment, unemployment and participation rates are examined for Aboriginals living off-reserve in Canada from 2007 to 2014 as well as for non-Aboriginals for those 15 years and older. Employment is analyzed by educational level, gender and age, province and by industrial sector. The rates of employment and unemployment for Aboriginals have continued to improve in 2014, lessening the differences with non-Aboriginals. These improvements occurred in each age category for both men and women, except for the unemployment rate of Aboriginal women in the 25 to 54 year old group. The Metis employment, participation and unemployment rates have been more favourable than the First Nations for each year from 2007 to 2014. The level of education obtained continued to show a strong positive relationship with the rate of employment for Aboriginals and non-Aboriginals. When employment rates are examined by educational level, there is very little difference between Aboriginals and non-Aboriginals. However educational level does not explain the differences in unemployment rates. The highest rate of employment for Aboriginals and non-Aboriginals in 2014 continued to be in Alberta. Employment continued to increase in the services-producing sector, but decreased in the goods-producing sector for Aboriginals and non-Aboriginals in 2014.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".