Bibliographic record
Abstract
This design was inspired by Mi'kmaq quill work, something in which the Mi'kmaq people are famous for.I wanted to represent the Northeastern First Nation people of Canada.We often see many representations of Indigenous cultures from the north such as Inuit and Cree.Also from the west and the south such as Black foot, Ojibway, Apache, etc.Those are the familiar Art styles that we often see represented in mainstream media.Even though different tribes share some similarities with each other, each one is unique.I know my people did not wear headdresses like the ones in the west and south, nor do I believe the famous and now commercialized dream catcher originated with us.So that is why I took my inspiration from works of art actually created by our people.Quill work is one of those works of art that has been around for centuries and was widely used by the Mi'kmaq.I used a sunrise design to go with the theme of this year's conference "A New Dawn in Indigenous Economies".I added two circles interlocking to symbolize unity, one is a half circle connected to the earth, meaning we are grounded and close to mother earth.What the theme says to me is, we are gaining back our pride and independence as the first people of this country by reconnecting and coming together.The human figure at the top is what I used to symbolize our ancestors that came before us.There are small white dots behind them going in a disk shape, those are stars.I put them there to say, that our ancestors that are above will guide us through changes and lessons in life.The tipi's or "wigwams", I used to represent "home".This is where home is and it has been for centuries.And lastly, the bottom design was inspired by the traditional double curve that is used in many works of art of the Mi'kmaq people.I used some elements such as the berries at the end and the flower in the middle to represent nature's abundance and our growth as a nation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.515 | 0.280 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".