Comprehensive Evaluation of Lateral Performance of Innovative Post in Sand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under environmental loads such as wind and earthquakes, piles are subjected to large lateral loads. A foundation system denoted Innovative Post (IP) that is composed of an H-pile shaft and one or two steel plates (paddles) welded to its flanges, has been developed to resist large lateral loads on sound wall systems. The present study evaluates the performance of IP installed in layered cohesionless soils through a comprehensive full-scale lateral load testing program and finite element (FE) analysis considering various pile and plate configurations. The developed FE model was validated employing the field test data and was then employed to conduct a parametric study to evaluate the performance of IP considering different paddles geometry (i.e., number of paddles, single or double, width, and length). The results demonstrated that adding the plates significantly increased the lateral capacity of H-piles. A positive relationship was identified between paddle’s width and length and the load efficiency. Optimal parameter values for paddles are established based on the experimental and numerical results proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".