MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392818624 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0298320

Statistical segmentation model for accurate electrode positioning in Parkinson’s deep brain stimulation based on clinical low-resolution image data and electrophysiology

2024· article· en· W4392818624 on OpenAlexafffund
Igor Varga, Eduard Bakštein, Greydon Gilmore, Jaromír May, Daniel Novák

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersResearch Center for Informatics, Czech Technical University in PragueMinisterstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské RepublikyMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyLawson Health Research InstituteČeské Vysoké Učení Technické v Praze
KeywordsSubthalamic nucleusDeep brain stimulationSegmentationArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceElectrophysiologyParkinson's diseasePattern recognition (psychology)MedicineComputer visionNeurosciencePathologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), applying chronic electrical stimulation of subcortical structures, is a clinical intervention applied in major neurologic disorders. In order to achieve a good clinical effect, accurate electrode placement is necessary. The primary localisation is typically based on presurgical MRI imaging, often followed by intra-operative electrophysiology recording to increase the accuracy and to compensate for brain shift, especially in cases where the surgical target is small, and there is low contrast: e.g., in Parkinson's disease (PD) and in its common target, the subthalamic nucleus (STN). METHODS: We propose a novel, fully automatic method for intra-operative surgical navigation. First, the surgical target is segmented in presurgical MRI images using a statistical shape-intensity model. Next, automated alignment with intra-operatively recorded microelectrode recordings is performed using a probabilistic model of STN electrophysiology. We apply the method to a dataset of 120 PD patients with clinical T2 1.5T images, of which 48 also had available microelectrode recordings (MER). RESULTS: The proposed segmentation method achieved STN segmentation accuracy around dice = 0.60 compared to manual segmentation. This is comparable to the state-of-the-art on low-resolution clinical MRI data. When combined with electrophysiology-based alignment, we achieved an accuracy of 0.85 for correctly including recording sites of STN-labelled MERs in the final STN volume. CONCLUSION: The proposed method combines image-based segmentation of the subthalamic nucleus with microelectrode recordings to estimate their mutual location during the surgery in a fully automated process. Apart from its potential use in clinical targeting, the method can be used to map electrophysiological properties to specific parts of the basal ganglia structures and their vicinity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicNeurological disorders and treatments→French-language works237,207→