MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392823604 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2024.3374052

A Digitally Controlled Bidirectional 24–32-GHz Variable Gain Phase Shifter in 45-nm SOI CMOS

2024· article· en· W4392823604 on OpenAlexafffund
Mehran Hazer Sahlabadi, Hang Yu, Jingjing Xia, Slim Boumaiza

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Research Foundation
KeywordsPhase shift moduleCMOSSilicon on insulatorAutomatic gain controlElectronic engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)Variable-gain amplifierPhase (matter)Bandwidth (computing)EngineeringElectrical engineeringInsertion lossPhysicsOptoelectronicsAmplifierSiliconTelecommunicationsOperational amplifier

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel topology for a bidirectional variable gain phase shifter (VGPS) circuit. The proposed VGPS circuit includes an in-phase-power-splitting stage that evenly divides the input signal. These two resulting signals are then directed into two separate phase-only tunable components achieved through phase shifters (PSs). Careful selection of specific phase settings for the two PSs yields the desired overall gain and phase shift when their outputs are combined. The operational principle and theoretical analysis of the proposed VGPS circuit are provided. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed topology, a VGPS circuit demonstrator was implemented using 45 nm Silicon-on-Insulator CMOS technology. The demonstrator incorporates two reflection-type phase shifters and non-isolated splitters/combiners at the input/output, fitting within a compact area of 0.179 mm2. Measurement results reveal excellent gain and phase tuning ranges of 20 dB (ranging from -7.5 dB to -27.5 dB) and 360∘, respectively. Moreover, the demonstrator maintains precise control over phase and gain ranges with a tuning step of 5.6∘/1 dB while ensuring total root mean square phase and gain errors remain below 1.6∘ and 0.25 dB, respectively, across a bandwidth spanning 24-32 GHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express BriefsSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207