MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392824812 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2024.3375816

Joint Spectrum, Precoding, and Phase Shifts Design for RIS-Aided Multiuser MIMO THz Systems

2024· article· en· W4392824812 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Reza Mehrabian, Vincent W. S. Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecodingElectronic engineeringJoint (building)MIMOZero-forcing precodingComputer scienceTelecommunicationsEngineeringPhysicsElectrical engineeringBeamforming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Terahertz (THz) wireless systems aim to support content-rich applications with ultra-high data rate. Due to high molecular absorption, THz signals experience severe path loss over long distance. To alleviate distance limitation, reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) can improve the coverage range. Adaptive sub-band bandwidth (ASB) allocation can mitigate absorption attenuation by allocating THz sub-bands with variable bandwidth to the users. However, in ASB allocation, since the bandwidth of sub-bands may not be knowna priori, accurate channel estimation is challenging. To overcome this issue, in this paper, we propose a metapath-based heterogeneous graph-transformer network (MHGphormer) to bypass the channel estimation phase. We formulate a sum-rate maximization problem with quality-of-service (QoS) constraints in a RIS-aided multiuser multiple-input multiple-output (MU-MIMO) THz system to optimize the precoding, phase shifts, and ASB allocation. The proposed MHGphormer parameterizes the mapping from input (e.g., location information, users’ minimum data rate) to the optimized system parameters via unsupervised learning. The proposed MHGphormer has the permutation invariance/equivariance property. It can be applied to systems with different number of users. Simulation results show that our proposed MHGphormer achieves a higher system sum-rate when compared with the homogeneous graph neural network, unsupervised deep neural network, and alternating optimization baseline algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207